аЯрЁБс>ўџ 35ўџџџ2џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьЅС @ №П bjbj00 "0RbRbџџџџџџˆ2222222Fъ ъ ъ ъ  Fл Ж. . . . . . . . Z \ \ \ \ \ \ $‘RуЂ€ 2ж . . ж ж € 22. . • О О О ж j2. 2. Z О ж Z О О 22О . " р%ˆЧъ @ :О Z Ћ 0л О …z :…О FF2222…2О œ. >l ,О ˜ $М . . . € € FFЄъ Д FFъ Faculty Council Meeting October 11, 2006 Attending: Harvey Boller, Ian Boussy, Heather Cannon, Pamela Caughie, Kim Dell’Angela, Janis Fine, Walter Jay, Ayana Karanja, Chris Kendrick, Nick Lash, Dawn Lynn, David Mirza, Gordon Ramsey, Henry Rose, Bill Schmidt, Allen Shoenberger, Michael Zinaman 1. Invocation: Bill Schmidt provided an invocation. 2. Approval of the minutes. Walter Jay moved that the minutes of the meeting of September be approved. The motion was seconded by Pamela Caughie. Passed 17-0-0. 3. Chair’s Report: The FC Chair, Gerry McDonald, distributed copies of the last month’s minutes, the agenda, proposed changes in the Faculty Handbook, and Fr. Garanzini’s (Fr.G) response to the Faculty Council’s (FC) proposed changes to the University-Shared Governance Charter FC may need to an additional meeting, in the next two or three weeks, prior to the next scheduled meeting, to address some important issues that, due to a time limitations, may not be addressed this meeting. A motion to hold another meeting passed 16-0-0. It was not settled among FC members, however, whether the additional meeting should be held on October 25, or on November 2nd. 4. Sabbatical Policy: Due to the passing of his father, David Schweickart was unable to attend the meeting. Nonetheless, he sent an email message to Faculty Council members calling for the formation of an ad hoc committee to study the issue of Sabbatical policy. This issue was tabled until next month. 5. Lake Shore Campus Preschool Facilities: Gerry McDonald stated that Staff Council & FC may wish to meet to provide a common response on the preschool issue. The program, at lake shore campus, benefits those faculty and staff who have preschool children. Ian Boussy gave a report based on his meeting with Bev Donavon. The preschool at КкСЯУХis at capacity. Faculty and staff would like to see it grow but this would require start up money. It is not subsidized by КкСЯУХother than space has been allocated to it at Lake Shore Campus. Many faculty members have been quite pleased with the program. A problem is that the facility is at full capacity and has no space left. Consequently a summer program for older children has been discontinued due to lack of space. Hence, there was a call for the university to provide more space. Also, the preschool cannot accommodate children less than two years of age. There are two types of programs. The programs for older children such as after school and summer programs are relatively inexpensive. The other program aimed at preschool children under two is significantly more expensive because of the caretaker-to-children ratio is considerably higher. The preschool program is listed as a КкСЯУХbenefit but several FC members questioned whether it indeed qualified as a benefit as it did not appear that it was not being subsidized by Loyola. The cost is currently $10,000 a year. The cost was perceived as being competitive, and hence does not reflect any subsidy. Approximately one-half the students are the children of КкСЯУХfaculty or staff. Several other universities have preschool facilities. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology has an especially attractive program. Several FC members called for the need for a larger facility whose startup costs would be covered by the University. Gerry McDonald suggested that space constraints may be a major concern to the administration. David Mirza added that given that Damen Hall is being demolished underlines the importance of space at the lake shore campus. Gerry McDonald further suggested that FC should respond to Dr. Boussy’s report. It was suggested that a preschool facility could be an attractive recruitment tool. 6. Father Garanzini’s Response to the FC’s Proposed Changes to the University Shared Governance Charter. There was a long and involved discussion of Father Garanzini’s response to the FC’s proposed changes to the shared governance charter. An aim of the FC’s deliberation was to reach a common ground that would be acceptable both to Fr. G. and the FC. Paul Jay was the primary leader of this discussion. FC welcomed Fr. G’s acceptance of the change from “affinity groups” to “elected groups.” Regarding the procedures for deliberation and policy development, Fr. G. did not want to give the FC the right not only to review but also to approve all substantive policy recommendations before they are forwarded by the FA-UPC for approval to the Senior Academic Officer or the President. In its deliberations, FC accepted a revision that dropped the language that that FC “shall approve all substantive recommendations.” Gordon Ramsey suggested that there was no need to give FC a veto on such proposals as FC can always voice their disapproval of issues to the faculty at large and the administration. Fr. G opposed the FC’s proposal to add faculty representatives to the AA-UPC suggesting that large committees can prove unwieldy. FC conceded the point of large committees, but wanted to have the AA-UPC to have a faculty majority, whatever the optimal size. FC also suggested that administrators serving on UPCs should not also serve as the committee’s chair. Paul Jay believes that FC committees should be reformulated so that they more closely parallel the UPCs thereby allowing FC members to serve both on an FC committee and also on the parallel UPC. 7. Contingent Faculty Pamela Caughie believes that it is very important that contingent faculty, that is those faculty who are not full time, tenure track faculty, have representation on the UPCs. This led to considerable discussion regarding which faculty were considered contingent, whether an individual could truly represent such a diverse body, and also how best to address their issues. There was a consensus that more discussion was needed on this issue. David Mirza offered a motion that the discussion be tabled. The motion passed 14-0-4. 8. Motion to Adjourn Harvey Boller offered a motion to adjourn. It was seconded by Nick Lash. The motion passed 18-0-0. Respectfully submitted, Nicholas A. lash )- / 2 < ? @ L d e f j  ё ї     < I И П ц ю " # $ % & L e j l ѕ ї  : K u ~ Ѓ Ѕ Ї Љ ­ З И ќјќєќячќуќєќпквЮЪЮєТєКЕКєЪєБєЪєпєпєп­Љ­п­є­Ѕ­Ъ­Ѕп˜ˆhHUhm1ш5hHUhHU5 h>cЉ5hтhНhтhНH*h єh6m|hтhНhAi‡ h6m|5hЎ^ЅhЎ^Ѕ5h>cЉhЎ^Ѕ5hЪ.Пh @h,jh @5 h @5hm1шh>cЉhHUhќ0L5 hЎ^Ѕ5hЎ^Ѕhhќ0L5)*. / @ e f ƒ  # % Ј Љ Т н о туAB|}ЂЃ§§§§§§§§јј§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§gd @ §И О С Т  ž Ћ Г Е н о є ї ў   ЂЌ$M .U^gz{3=‚12Орњ1gk‘ЗИЖЗИ !mЉQRS­їђъцтотктвЭвХРХМкИкМкМкДАДкМДМЌМЌИЌИЌоЈЄДЄЈ œ—œИЄИœИ‹hО hh:ёh˜+/5 hЪ.П5h˜+/h[I‡h=RHhе[—hпѕh7vhц#0hЪ.ПhžX‰ hЯА5hžX‰hžX‰5 h>cЉ5hžX‰hHU5h>cЉhЯАhHUhm1шh>cЉhm1ш5 hžX‰5hHUhHU56Ѓ23НОЗИ!"ST­Ўгд{|CDZ[lmƒш§§§§§§§§§§§§јј§§§§§§§§§§§§§§gdŠkў­і\mˆ“ z{|Ž•@BCDGZcdШгпч9F­ИЯmƒЅЌЖОщѕ     ќјќјќє№є№є№ќ№ь№ќ№ь№ќьшфшпзшгшЯшЯшЫЯЫЯЫшЫУЫПЫЯЫЯЫЛЗГЏhќ0LhžX‰hпѕh˜+/h[hЪ.ПhЪ.П5h›LЈhЪ.ПhО hhвy”hвy”5 hЪ.П5h˜>hвy”h1Оh[I‡h=RHhAi‡hŠkў4шщ            §§§§§§§§§§§§§ 1hАа/ Ар=!А"А# $ %Аœ@@ёџ@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DAђџЁD Default Paragraph FontRiѓџГR  Table Normalі4ж l4жaі (kєџС(No List0џџџџ)*./@efƒ  #%ЈЉТно туAB| } Ђ Ѓ 2 3 Н О ЗИ!"ST­Ўгд{|CDZ[lmƒшщ˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€€˜0€€˜0€€€˜0€€ €˜0€€˜0€€€˜0€€˜0€€€˜0€€˜0€€ €˜0€€˜0€€ ˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€ €˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€x˜0€€ €˜0€€ €˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€ €˜0€€x˜0€€˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€˜0€€x˜0€€x˜0€€€˜0€€x˜0€€˜0€€€˜0€€x˜0€€€˜0€€x˜0€€€˜0€€x˜0€€ €˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€x˜0€€ €И ­ Ѓш  џџlcL›ХmcЬ—Хnc,vУocдkЯттч(цьь9*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€place€8*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€date€=*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €PlaceType€ €10€11€2006€Day€Month€Year=Cu€&-ЙНД Й Š€ˆћ И ЎГ3333ЉТRlmƒ!х Z ˜>˜+/ц#0 @=RHќ0LHUСKgО h,j7v6m|[I‡Ai‡žX‰вy”е[—[Ў^Ѕ›LЈ>cЉ2­ЯАтhН1ОЪ.Пm1ш:ё єпѕŠkўџ@€]P@џџUnknownџџџџџџџџџџџџG‡z €џTimes New Roman5€Symbol3& ‡z €џArial"qˆˆX№аhgrЋFgrЋF4dЊ†#™ƒ +™ƒ +!№ ДД24d3ƒQ№HP)№џ?фџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџќ0LџџFaculty Council Meeting Nicholas A. LashInformation Servicesўџр…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0Ќ˜ РЬшє 4@ \ h t €Œ”œЄфFaculty Council Meeting Nicholas A. Lash Normal.dotInformation Services2Microsoft Word 10.0@’Ву@hХQюЦ@ТЧ@ТЧ™ƒўџеЭеœ.“—+,љЎ0 hp”œЄЌ ДМФЬ д јф КкСЯУХUniversity Chicago+ Ё Faculty Council Meeting Title ўџџџ !ўџџџ#$%&'()ўџџџ+,-./01ўџџџ§џџџ4ўџџџўџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entryџџџџџџџџ РF–Ч6€1Tableџџџџџџџџ…WordDocumentџџџџџџџџ"0SummaryInformation(џџџџ"DocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџџџџџ*CompObjџџџџџџџџџџџџjџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8є9Вq