黑料门

×

On the border

Law students assist immigrants being held in Arizona detention centers

During the first week of March, before the COVID-19 pandemic began to restrict person-to-person contact in the United States, 11 黑料门law students spent their spring break volunteering to assist immigrants being held in detention centers in Arizona. The social justice experience will have a lasting effect on their law careers and on the lives of the people they helped.

The glaring early-March sun heats up the asphalt and surrounding desert on the highway from Tucson to Eloy, Arizona. It鈥檚 a bleak route for the 黑料门law team traveling between two federal detention centers in the south-central part of the state. But it鈥檚 nothing compared to the long and harrowing journey most immigrants endure as they come to America鈥檚 borders in search of a better life.

鈥淥ur big-picture goal was to provide as much legal assistance to as many as possible in a week鈥檚 time,鈥 says Professor Katherine Kaufka Walts, who, along with eight student volunteers and a few professional colleagues, spent spring break providing free legal aid to some of the state鈥檚 7,000 immigrants鈥2,500 of whom are held at the Enforcement detention centers in Eloy.

Hands-on experience

Students share their stories about working with immigrants and refugees. Learn more about their experiences.

LEARN MORE

The primary purpose of the Immigrant Detention Project trip鈥攇enerously funded by The John & Kathleen Schreiber Foundation鈥攚as to assist lawyers at the , the only organization in Arizona that provides free legal aid and social services to detained men, women, and children who are under threat of deportation. Many of the immigrants have fled their home countries due to horrendous circumstances, such as severe political unrest, crushing poverty, and chronic gang-related violence.

鈥淏ecause deportation is a civil, rather than criminal, sanction, detainees are not afforded the constitutional protection of representation under the Sixth Amendment,鈥 Kaufka Walts says. 鈥淪tudents could see how current immigration policies affect real human beings and begin to learn about the complexities of U.S. immigration law. They saw how unjust it is to ask asylum seekers to represent themselves, not only against an immigration judge, but also against a Department of Homeland Security trial attorney who presents the government鈥檚 case against them鈥攁nd in a foreign language.鈥

鈥淭he presence or absence of legal representation for detained immigrants can mean life in the U.S., or persecution or even death in their home country.鈥

According to Kaufka Walts, detained immigrants, particularly those held in remote locations, face the additional obstacle of accessing counsel from a secured facility. 

During the one-week trip, the 黑料门team in Arizona worked with five asylum clients, observed more than 50 immigration court hearings, and assisted with information intake for 15 detainees at a know-your-rights presentation. Three additional students stayed on campus in Chicago with a supervising legal scholar to develop a manual for immigration attorneys working with detained children on how to report abuses against children. 鈥淚t was a pretty intense week for us,鈥 says Kaufka Walts.

Location, location, location

鈥淛udges have considerable discretion over whether to grant or deny asylum applications,鈥 says Kaufka Walts. She cited Syracuse University鈥檚 2019 Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) study, which revealed that the location where an immigrant files for asylum and which judge is assigned to the case 鈥渃an play an influential鈥攅ven determinate鈥攔ole in the asylum decision reached.鈥 Immigration judges decided a record number of asylum cases in 2019, and of the 67,406 cases decided, 69 percent were denied. 

In Eloy, for example, more than 85 percent of cases in 2019 were denied; in Chicago, the denial rate was less than 50 percent. Some of the highest rates of denials鈥攎ore than 90 percent鈥攚ere in Houston; El Paso, Texas; and Louisville, Kentucky. Both New York City and San Francisco denied less than 30 percent of cases.

To prepare students for the trip, Kaufka Walts, who also is director of the law school鈥檚 Center for the Human Rights of Children, and her Immigration Law Practicum co-instructor Judge Beatriz Frausto-Sandoval provided a primer that included a brief history of immigration law and policy, an introduction to foundational law, and information about some of the skills they would need for their visit. For example, students learned how to prepare clients for credible fear interviews in which detainees before an immigration judge must establish a 鈥渟ignificant possibility鈥 of being persecuted on the basis of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion if returned to their country. Students also received skills-based training in trauma-informed interviewing and managing vicarious trauma.

Students could see how current immigration policies affect real human beings and begin to learn about the complexities of U.S. immigration law.鈥

鈥淚 had never been in a detention center before this trip,鈥 says student Fabiola Villalpando, who helped a client fleeing political persecution. 鈥淭here were armed guards and razor wire on top of the walls, and the men and women wore prison jumpsuits. It was a hostile environment.鈥

On the first day, Villalpando spent four hours with clients gathering information needed for their asylum applications and explaining the hearing process. She then spent two days helping them complete their forms, and one more afternoon helping them review and sign their documents. 鈥淚t was definitely a crunch because we wanted to be as thorough as possible with their applications, but we were facing time constraints,鈥 she says.

鈥淚 wish we could know what happens to them,鈥 she adds. 鈥淏ut with so many cases backlogged in the system鈥攁nd especially now with the added stress of the coronavirus pandemic鈥擨 think that finding out how each case is resolved would be nearly impossible.鈥

Cura personalis in action

Last November, when Kaufka Walts approached newly retired Chicago immigration judge Jennie L. Giambastiani (JFRC 鈥82, JD 鈥86) about joining the trip, Giambastiani jumped at the chance.

鈥淭he students are at the beginning of their legal careers and have never had such direct contact with those facing the emotional horrors of being held captive without knowing what was happening to them,鈥 she says. 鈥淚 was there to guide them as they analyzed and crafted the petitions.鈥 

Throughout her career, Giambastiani has drawn on her 黑料门education and the idea of cura personalis鈥攃are for the whole person鈥攖o guide her. 鈥淚 followed and applied the law,鈥 she says, 鈥渂ut also tried to conduct myself with a degree of compassion.鈥

For Loyola鈥檚 School of Law, the trip exemplifies a critical social justice step to provide a vulnerable population with a necessary legal service. 

鈥淪tudents were face to face with clients, working within very tight deadlines, and spending 11-hour days putting together applications that would affect the rest of their clients鈥 lives,鈥 says Kaufka Walts. 鈥淭he stakes were high.鈥

Pointing again to Syracuse鈥檚 2019 TRAC data, Kaufka Walts says that of the 1.2 million U.S. deportation cases decided between 2007 and 2012, clients who had representation in court were 10 times more likely to get relief. But less than 15 percent of detained immigrants have legal representation.

鈥淭his is why the Immigration Detention Project is so important鈥攖he presence or absence of legal representation for detained immigrants can mean life in the U.S., or persecution or even death in their home country,鈥 Kaufka Walts says. 鈥淚t can mean family reunification, or the devastation of family separation. It鈥檚 important work.鈥 鈥揅arla Beecher

Katherine Kaufka Walts coordinated the Immigrant Detention Project trip with Roc铆o Casta帽eda (JD 鈥13), a special projects attorney at the Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project, which is named for its location in Florence, Arizona.

From 黑料门Law Magazine 2020


			CTA

The Center for the Human Rights of Children applies a human-rights approach to the problems affecting children, reaffirming the recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family, including children, is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world. Learn More